Berge–Fulkerson conjecture logo

Berge–Fulkerson conjecture

Let G be a finite bridgeless cubic graph (every vertex has degree 3 and no edge is a bridge). Do there exist six perfect matchings M₁, …, M₆ of G, repetitions allowed, such that ev

free Web Programming Research Lab

Berge–Fulkerson conjecture is a programming research lab tool built by Prove Together. It's best for Mathematicians and Computer scientists. Pricing is free.

Pricing

free

Audience

Mathematicians

Platforms

Community

0%

About Berge–Fulkerson conjecture

Berge–Fulkerson conjecture is an open problem in graph theory, specifically concerning finite bridgeless cubic graphs and their perfect matchings, hosted on the Prove Together platform for formal verification.

The Berge–Fulkerson conjecture, as presented on Prove Together, posits that for any finite bridgeless cubic graph, there exist six perfect matchings (M₁, …, M₆), with repetitions allowed, such that every edge of the graph belongs to exactly two of them. This problem is rated "Outstanding" by Open Problem Garden and is significant because it implies that every bridgeless cubic graph is close to being 3-edge-colourable, even including complex cases like snarks (e.g., the Petersen graph).

The platform provides a formal definition of the conjecture as a Prop in the Lean 4.33.1 environment, which must be accepted by a deployed verifier. This formal availability ensures a precise statement for verification efforts. The problem's status is open, attributed to Berge and Fulkerson, with its origins traced back to Fulkerson (1971) and Seymour (1979).

Prove Together facilitates the collaborative and formal exploration of such mathematical conjectures. It lists "Formal targets" like `Corpus.BergeFulkerson.conjecture` for precise statements, "Reusable lemmas" such as `Agent18_KL2_20260911.two_switch_sufficiency` and `Agent18_HellyLoads_20260911.six_load_uniqueness` that contribute to the problem's solution, and a "Public discussion" section for research and audited auxiliary results. The platform emphasizes that accepting a target does not constitute a proof, but rather a verified formal statement within a pinned environment.

Key Features

Formal problem statement in Lean 4.33.1
Deployed verifier for formal targets
Listing of reusable lemmas
Public discussion forum for research
Attribution and historical context of conjectures
Integration with Open Problem Garden for problem status
SHA-256 source verification for formal definitions
Pinned environment for consistent verification
Corpus curator for problem management

Pricing

free

The platform appears to be free for accessing and contributing to mathematical conjectures and their formal proofs.

Who is it for?

Best for

  • Formalizing and verifying mathematical conjectures
  • Collaborative research in graph theory and related fields
  • Learning and contributing to formal mathematics using Lean 4

Not ideal for

  • General-purpose project management
  • Non-academic or non-research-oriented users
  • Users unfamiliar with formal verification or Lean 4

Integrations

Open Problem Garden

Community Discussion

Sign in to contribute

No discussions yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Frequently asked questions